HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Next War Supplemental Reported to be Enormous

In a continued effort to totally ignore Congress's request to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through the regular annual appropriations process, the Defense Department is in the process of constructing a new supplemental funding request for the wars for FY 2007 - reported to be a whopping $160 billion. Combined with the current $70 billion FY 2007 apporpriations for Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States could spend $230 billion on the wars by the time this fiscal year ends next September. That's approximately half of the total spending on the wars so far!

As if this wasn't bad enough, an internal Defense Department memo sent at the end of October encouraged the individual services to include even more money outside of the war effort in their supplemental requests. From CQ Today: ($)

In an Oct. 25 memorandum that expanded the emergency spending to costs associated with the global war on terrorism, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England encouraged the services to seek large supplemental requests. In the past, the Pentagon has used supplementals only to seek money for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Estimates are to include incremental costs related to the longer war against terror,” England wrote, specifically saying those costs could include repairing and replacing equipment as well as changing force structures.

We've said many, many, many times that the increasing reliance on supplemental appropriation requests poses significant threats to the fiscal health of the country. Supplementals weakenen fiscal responsibility, errode opportunities for congressional oversight (not that Congress is really all that interested in oversight these days), increase the opportunity for waste, fraud, and abuse of federal resources, and discourage long-term planning and preparedness. When is the Bush adiministration going to learn?



Posted by Adam Hughes



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

TARP: Additional Actions Needed to Better Ensure Integrity, Accountability, and Transparency

TARP Oversight Continues Down Bumpy Road

It's Now Officially a Recession

Happy Thanksgiving!

A Few Trillion More Than 700 Billion

Competitive Sourcing Continues to Fail

Friendly Advice

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

Archived Entries for Budget Process

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

June, 2005

March, 2005