Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Tuesday, December 12, 2006

FEC Denies Association's Proposal

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has proposed that state associations send a larger portion of individual contributions to the NAR, in turn lowering the amount of money going to the state political action committee. In exchange, the NAR will give an equal amount of money from its treasury account to the state association. NAR had asked the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) whether this proposal would be permitted. Other similar groups are interested in ways to expand the ability to raise hard money.

The National Association of Realtors asked for an advisory opinion from the FEC (AO 2006-33) regarding a proposal to pay money directly from the corporate treasury of the national trade association to state associations affiliated with the national group. The payments would be made to encourage state associations' PACs to provide more hard money from individual members to the national realtors' PAC. The FEC draft concludes that the proposed arrangement would amount to a trade of corporate "soft money" for hard money and is prohibited.

BNA Money and Politics (subscription required) details this case while this blog entry from the Center for Competitive Politics disagrees with the FEC's decision.
Update: BNA Money and Politics reports that the FEC commissioners voted against the draft's conclusion. "Rejecting advice from the agency's staff attorneys, the Federal Election Commission voted 4-2 Dec. 14 to allow a national trade group to finance "hard money" fund-raising efforts by its state affiliates to benefit the national group's political action committee."



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

RFK, Jr. Helps Launch New Voter Protection Project

Attention Oregonians: Ballot Measure Could Silence the Voice of Charities

501(c)(4) Accused of Violating Campaign Finance Law With Ads Attacking Obama

Convention Parties Unaltered by Ethics Rules?

Sharpton Announces New Voter Protection and Voter Registration Initiative

The Search Engine That Couldn't

Hans von Spakovsky Now Working With Civil Rights Commission?

Filing An FEC Compliant On YouTube

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Treasury Again Disregards Concerns with the Anti-Terrorism Financing Guidelines

Archived Entries for Elections and Issue Advocacy

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004