Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Special Topics :  Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics :  Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog : 
Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog:     

Lobbying and Ethics
Reform Blog


Thursday, January 18, 2007

S. 1 Hits Snag Over Line-Item Veto

S. 1 (text), the Senate ethics and lobbying bill (now in its second week on the floor), lies in a state of legislative limbo following the failure of a cloture vote, 51-46, late last night. Because S. 1 contains Senate rules changes, a two-thirds vote is required for cloture, rather than the usual 60 votes.

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH), on behalf of 30 co-sponsors, has filed an amendment to S. 1 that would grant limited line-item recission authority to the president. Unlike Congress' last bill giving the president line-item authority -- struck down by the Supreme Court in 1998 as unconstitutional -- the Gregg amendment provides that any rescissions of congressional spending would have to be approved by both houses of Congress.

But Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-WV), a jealous guardian of the prerogatives of the legislative branch, says that he will object to a vote on S. 1 if it includes the Gregg amendment.

Some of the meritorious parts of the baby that would go out with the bath water if S. 1 goes down: here.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

Most Recent Entries for Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog

New LDA Guidance, Again

Some Hiccups in Implementing New Ethics Law

New Lobbying Disclosure Rules Cause Confusion

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

September Argument Set In NAM Appeal

Updated LDA Guidance Including the New Form LD-203

Lobbyists Prepare for New Disclosure Reports

Lobbying Campaigns and PAC Contributions

NAM Discloses Membership Involved in Lobbying

Objection to Member Disclosure Law Continues

Archived Entries for Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

July

June

May

April

March

February

December, 2007

November, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007