HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Commissions & Task Forces & Working Groups, Oh My!

Yesterday afternoon, Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Pete Domenici (R-NM) announced plans to force Congress to consider changes to entitlement programs through the establishment of yet another commission. The Feinstein-Domenici plan would require a 15-member commission to deliver recommendations one year from the date it was established and would force, through specific deadlines, action by committees, debate on the floor or each chamber, and conference committee negotiations. Everything is scripted just so in the Feinstein/Domenici plan. It's almost as if we don't even need a Congress at all.

The Feinstein/Domenici announcement comes of the heels of two other proposals to establish entitlement commissions (or an entitlement task force), first by Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) and Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), and more recently by Sens. Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Judd Gregg (R-NH). Proposing commissions, task forces, and working groups is all fine and good, but until someone actually starts to propose some vital solutions - solutions that will only work if they increase revenues and decrease benefits over time - these proposals are mostly smoke, and little fire.

The most interesting thing about the Feinstein/Domenici commission is that it would be permanent - making fast-tracked recommendations to Congress every five years about adjustments and changes to keep solutions to fiscal problems on track. Feinstein and Domenici are apparently so confident in the commission model and potential recommendations it would submit, they think it should stick around, just in case it needs to fix its mistakes. While it is true it is a great challenge to tackle fiscal issues involving projections and estimation over many years and decades, and nobody can predict the future, a permanent commission would seem to take over the role of Congress, permanently. Only time will tell, but something tells me I'm not the only person who thinks that is just a little bit weird.

Posted by Adam Hughes



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

PAYGO in a Sour Economy

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

House Definitely Maybe Returning for Lame-Duck Session

Archived Entries for Entitlements

November

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

February, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

August, 2003