HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, February 08, 2007

Entitlement Enlightenment: Into the Bipartisian, Interbranch Breach

Senate Budget Committee chair Kent Conrad (D-ND) and OMB Direct Robert Portman outdid each other at yesterday's Committee hearing. They lavishly praised each other's sincerity and good-faith bipartisan commitment to restoring the nation's fiscal imbalances by guaranteeing long-term entitlement program solvency, taking pains and risks to be sure to leave everything on the table, sharing a good-natured chuckle at the off-message public comments of a naughty Vice President who tried take some minor taxware of the table in broad daylight.

The lyrics to their Kumbaya cooing were as follows:

Conrad: Let's go to where we might agree because there are places you and I agree. The place we agree is our long-term prognosis on the need to face up to the fiscal imbalances. You have said everything is on the table. What do you mean by that?

Portman: First of all, I agree with you. I think it is incredibly important we as public officials on both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue and both sides of the aisle acknowledge the problem and I commended you for that... [T]here should be no preconditions, meaning that everything should be on the table... [T]his is the biggest fiscal challenge that we face, and we should address it, and we should do so in a bipartisan way.

Conrad: Let me just follow up and ask you this question. When you say no preconditions, does that mean that you can foresee a resolution that includes both additional revenue as well as reduction in expenses for the long-term entitlements? I am asking, though, when your side says, "There are no preconditions," because you say this, Secretary Paulson says it, but then I see the President and the Vice President, when they are interviewed publicly, slam the door in terms of revenue.

Portman: Absolutely, there is a serious chance, but...

Conrad: So is revenue on the table? If there is a discussion, if we come together for a negotiation, is revenue on the table as far as the administration is concerned?

Portman: I don't know how I can be more clear.... we believe that we do not need additional revenues to get to balance in 2012.

Conrad: Director Portman, you are doing exactly what I feared......what I am hearing from you is exactly what I hear publicly from the President and Vice President — that this is only going to be done on the cost cutting side, which clearly has to be done, but nothing on the revenue side. If that is what you postulate, then there will not be a conclusion because then you are only asking one side fundamentally to compromise. If both sides aren't prepared to compromise, there will not be resolution during this administration, and that would be a tragedy.

Closing Comment from Chairman Conrad: We have an opportunity here to work together, but the only way I know in human relations for there to be resolution between parties who have different views is for both sides to compromise. And, unfortunately I see virtually none on your side. And I regret that more than I can say.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Friendly Advice

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

PAYGO in a Sour Economy

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

Archived Entries for Entitlements

November

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

February, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

August, 2003