Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, February 14, 2007

AMT Reform Offsets Seen in Corporate Breaks

House Ways and Means Committee chair Charles Rangel (D-NY) is on a scavenger hunt. With his sights on major Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) reform, he's on the lookout for offset provisions, the bigger the better. Reportedly, he's agreed to have House Select Revenue Subcommittee chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) vet solutions to the problem of how to keep the AMT from engulfing millions more taxpayers this year and beyond. None of the solutions will be cheap; all will require offsets.

Neal plans to open hearings in March on ways to pay for the $1 trillion cost of repealing the AMT, and Rangel has given notice that corporate tax breaks extended by Congress in recent years may come under scrunity.

A Bloomberg article on this issue, published Monday, spotlights some of the largest of these breaks, putting a few companies' effective tax rates under the microscope. General Electric Co.*, an example it cites, reduced its overall U.S. tax rate to 18 percent in 2005 from 32.5 percent in 1995, largely because of the rules congressional Republicans enacted during those years. "Eli Lilly, Hewlett-Packard* and other companies have also pushed their tax rates well below the top marginal rate of 35 percent in the last decade by basing operations in lower-tax countries and taking advantage of the U.S. rules," it adds.

Measures limiting the foreign tax credits companies claim for payments to other governments or setting new regulations on transactions that shift income from subsidiaries in higher-tax countries to those in lower-tax ones are politically and fiscally tempting.

It's unlikely that Rangel and Neal have a sweeping policy change in mind, but rather some quick hits. Most likely the initial focus will be on abuses of current law that Neal says are costing the government "an awful lot of money."

Just what the chairman ordered.

--------

* Incidentally, major federal contract recipients as well. See OMB Watch's FedSpending.org current company contractor profiles for:

General Electric

Hewlett-Packard



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Maybe It's the Money

More Secrecy Won't Help David

Notes from the Economy: Unemployment Insurance Claims

McCain and Obama on Outsourcing Government

The Best Laid Plans

Earmarks Declining? Not So Fast...

CHN Hosting Prep Webinar on Census Poverty Data Release

The $18 Trillion Mortgage

More on DCAA Dysfunction

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003