Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Focus On FEC Coordination Rule with an Early 2008 Presidential Race

BNA Money and Politics ($$) reports today on the latest in the clash between the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) and the sponsors of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). Reps. Christopher Shays (R-CT) and Martin Meehan (D-MA) have warned the FEC that what we might see before the 2008 elections are federal candidates relying on corporations, unions, or wealthy individuals to supply unlimited funding for advertising early in the 2008 race. Shays and Martin Meehan have filed a lawsuit objecting to these coordination rules. This is the third lawsuit Shays and Meehan have brought against the FEC, making the case known as Shays III. They have also introduced legislation (H.R. 421) that would eliminate the FEC and replace it with an entirely new agency.

In the 2008 presidential race, the tougher restrictions will not take effect until September, 120 days before the first presidential caucus in Iowa set for next January. Until then, according to critics, the FEC rule allows a presidential candidate to write an ad script, avoiding express advocacy, and send it to a corporation, union, or wealthy individual backer to pay the entire cost of production and air time. That result, critics contend, violates the fundamental legal prohibition against companies and unions financing federal campaigns and the principle that individual contributions to candidates should be limited.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Citizens United Again Denied Relief from Donor Disclosure Law

FEC Complaints Against DSCC Ads

Very Troubling Proposed HHS Rule Places Restrictions on Funding

OMB Watch and Grantmakers Without Borders Releases "Collateral Damage: How the War on Terror Hurts Charities, Foundations, and the People They Serve"

Maryland State Police Accused of Spying on Peace Activists

Almost Half of the Senate Co-Sponsor of Campaign Finance Disclosure Bill

New LDA Guidance, Again

Some Hiccups in Implementing New Ethics Law

Hostility towards Voter Registration?

FISA Amendments Act of 2008 Signed Into Law

Archived Entries for Elections and Issue Advocacy

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004