Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Special Topics :  Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics :  Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog : 
Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog:     

Lobbying and Ethics
Reform Blog


Friday, March 02, 2007

Grassroots Lobbying Center Point of Lobby Reform Hearing

Yesterday the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties held a hearing on the lobby reform measures included in S.1. The heated discussion on the issue of grassroots lobbying disclosure has not gone unnoticed. A BNA Money and Politics ($$) points out the undeniable prominence the issue had during the session. The hearing was intended to focus on the ethics and lobby changes passed in S.1, but instead focused mostly on a measure that was voted out of the bill. Republican members present were clearly opposed to grassroots lobbying disclosure and repeatedly expressed concern that it will hurt homegrown citizen to lawmaker communication and have a chilling effect on speech. Yet these remarks missed the point some witnesses were making; that grassroots lobbying disclosure will not impact homegrown campaigns, it is meant to target the major lobbyists. For example, when a firm is hired to generate communications to Congress, often the public has no idea who is paying for the campaign.

Roll Call ($$) reported that Representative Martin Meehan (D-MA) is planning on introducing a scaled back version of the grassroots lobbying disclosure provision. "As opposed to the Senate measure, the Meehan version would not require organizations that hire firms to help stimulate grass-roots activity to disclose those efforts. Instead, the measure focuses on the firms themselves." At the hearing yesterday Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) had planned on Rep. Meehan's presence to ask questions considering that he is working on the related proposal. However, the ranking member Trent Franks (R-AZ) objected, and a few minutes later Meehan left the room.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

Most Recent Entries for Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

September Argument Set In NAM Appeal

Updated LDA Guidance Including the New Form LD-203

Lobbyists Prepare for New Disclosure Reports

Lobbying Campaigns and PAC Contributions

NAM Discloses Membership Involved in Lobbying

Objection to Member Disclosure Law Continues

Member Disclosure Law Upheld, NAM To Appeal

Campaign Legal Center Updates Summary of New Lobbying and Ethics Law

Defense of Member Disclosure Law Based on Outdated Supreme Court Decision

Archived Entries for Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

July

June

May

April

March

February

December, 2007

November, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007