Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, March 29, 2007

Senate's 51-47 Supplemental Vote a Challenge to Bush

The Senate passed a $122 billion supplemental spending bill this afternoon by 51-47; it was a party-line vote, with all Democrats in favor and all GOP Senators opposed, except for Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Gordon Smith (R-OR), who supported the measure.

The House passed a similar but slight larger supplemental package last week. The two bills provide about $100 billion in spending for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the remainder on domestic needs -- the largest supplemental appropriations bills ever passed by their respective chambers. Last week and then again this week, President Bush issued successive veto threats against the House and Senate bills, citing "the excessive and extraneous non-emergency spending," presumably referring only to the domestic spending provisions.

Using specific target dates and stating those dates as a "deadline" (in the House's version) and a "goal" (in the Senate's), both houses of Congress have now called -- over the loud objections of the commander-in-chief expressed in his veto threats -- for complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from a war that has lasted longer than World War II and has been this nation's most expensive ever. The Senate bill further mandates that troop withdrawal commence within four months of enactment.

The Senate has appointed conferees but the House hasn't, so the conference won't begin until mid-April. The war funding, which the President says the troops must have by the end of April, is poised in limbo, with no sign that either side is prepared to reverse positions that are now a matter of record.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

America Continues to Drown in Debt

Byrd Postpones Second Supplemental, Two Other Approps Bills

JEC Ranking Member Highlights Troubling Trend in Income Inequality

Claims of "Magical" Tax Cuts Continue

Talk About Low Expectations

Bloch Deputy: Very Existence of the Office of Special Counsel "At Risk"

New CBO Report Shows Dire Consequences of Bush Tax Cuts, AMT Patching

Average Earnings Down for All Workers, Median Earnings Also Down for Full-Time Workers

Republicans Inch Toward Fiscal Responsibility

Stimulus Part Deux: Coming to Congress Near You

Archived Entries for Appropriations & Spending

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

July, 2004

June, 2004

May, 2004

April, 2004

March, 2004

February, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003