HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Supreme Court Proposes Increased Disclosure of Ties Between Amicus Filers, Parties

On May 17 the Supreme Court proposed several changes in its rules, including procedures for groups or individuals filing friend of the court (amicus curiae) briefs supporting a party in a pending case. Proposed rule 37.6 would impose a new disclosure requirement, expanding the current requirement that amicus filers disclose whether the attorneys for one of the parties in the case helped write the brief and identify outside funders. The new disclosure provision would require filers to also include:

…whether such counsel or a party is a member of the amicus curiae, or made a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of the brief, and shall identify every person other than the amicus curiae, its members, or its counsel, who made such monetary contribution.

The Clerk's comment on the proposed rule says, "The change would require the disclosure that a party made a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of an amicus curiae brief in the capacity of a member of the entity filing as amicus curiae." The proposal also addresses deadlines for filing amicus briefs, word limits and electronic filing incases where oral arguments is scheduled.

The proposal would not require a list of all members or donors of organizations filing amicus briefs. Instead, it would require disclosure of financial support from a party to a case to a group filing an amicus, as well as whether the party or their counsel is a member of the group.

The Court has invited public comments, due June 4. Comments should be in writing and sent to:
Clerk of the Court
Attn: Rules Committee
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, DC 20543

Posted by Kay Guinane



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Editorial Calls for Total Transparency by Lobbyists

Report Finds U.S. Aid Not Regularly Impartial

More Information Released on the Surveillance on Nonviolent Activists in MD

Reform Recommendations for Security Laws Impacting Charities and Foundations

Citizens United Case Goes to Supreme Court

Georgia GOP Seeking to Shorten Early Voting

Lobbying and 501(c)(3)'s

Rules for Lobbyists in Transition

More Foundations are Using Funds to Influence Public Policy

Brennan Center for Justice Proposes Universal Voter Registration

Archived Entries for General

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005