HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, June 07, 2007

Avandia Controversy Proves the Need for Better Regulatory Authority

The Washington Post recaps yesterday's House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on the safety of the diabetes drug Avandia manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. According to the article, a New England Journal of Medicine analysis "concluded that Avandia increases the risk of heart attack by 43 percent." However, FDA is "still analyzing conflicting data" about the drug's effects.

There may not be consensus on the exact side effects of Avandia, but one thing is for sure: Avandia has been on the market for years and no one — not FDA, GlaxoSmithKline, Congress, or the public — is confident of its safety.

Such obvious lapses beg a solution. The FDA reform bill passed by the Senate last month would expand FDA's ability to force drug makers to conduct prompt post-market safety studies. Some aspects of the bill (expanding the agency's user-fee program) are problematic, but this provision is a must pass.

Similar drug safety problems are bound to occur in the future. But there is no excuse for being unsure of a drug's side effects for so long. Drug makers and the FDA should stop trying to cover their mistakes. The American people are smarter than they think. Knowledge breeds confidence. FDA should be in the business of providing the public with knowledge.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Science Advisors Chide FDA on Plastics Chemical

Archived Entries for In Congress

November

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004