Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, June 14, 2007

Show Me The List

I'm a little confused. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) has list of 147 Republican Congresspersons who have pledged to vote to sustain any presidential veto of FY 2008 spending bills.

House Republicans have done an impressive job of ruining their fiscal credibility with voters, and it won't be easy making amends. Today, however, they are taking one step toward redemption when Texan Jeb Hensarling announces that he's gathered signatures from 147 House GOP Members promising to sustain vetoes of any spending bill that exceeds President Bush's budget requests.

I'm really at a loss to explain why Hensarling would wave this list around and make promises about 147 Republicans, because he's going to look awfully silly when Congress overrides any spending bill veto. Either Hensarling will have to eat crow and admit he was full of it, or he will have point to a number of his Republican collegues who failed to make good on their commitments.

And based on this reporting from CongressDaily PM ($) yesterday, it seems that Hensarling is in fact "rounding upwards" the number of veto-sustainers, or the promised sustainers are already showing their, ummm, "flexibility."

OMB Director Portman had previously told reporters even the popular military housing and veterans' funding bill could be subject to a veto threat, as the White House attempts to take a hard line over the $23 billion overall spending increase...But veterans' health is an even more sensitive and emotional issue politically, and GOP aides said Bush would not have the votes to sustain a veto in either chamber.

So, is Hensarling being totally straight with us, or are certain Republican representatives already losing their resolve? There's really only one way to figure this out: Show me that list, Hensarling!



Posted by Craig Jennings



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

America Continues to Drown in Debt

Byrd Postpones Second Supplemental, Two Other Approps Bills

JEC Ranking Member Highlights Troubling Trend in Income Inequality

Claims of "Magical" Tax Cuts Continue

Talk About Low Expectations

Bloch Deputy: Very Existence of the Office of Special Counsel "At Risk"

New CBO Report Shows Dire Consequences of Bush Tax Cuts, AMT Patching

Average Earnings Down for All Workers, Median Earnings Also Down for Full-Time Workers

Republicans Inch Toward Fiscal Responsibility

Stimulus Part Deux: Coming to Congress Near You

Archived Entries for Budget Process

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

June, 2005

March, 2005