HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, June 15, 2007

Earmarks Impasse Ends -- Obey to Permit Amendments

Late yesterday, the week-long impasse between House Appropriations chair David Obey (D-WI) and the House GOP leadership came to an end, with Obey agreeing generally to include earmarks in FY 2008 spending bills before they come to the floor. He had earlier declared that earmarks would be added in conference committee negotiations -- when bills are no longer subject to amendment -- making the removal of individual earmarks impossible.

Uncertain still are other terms of the agreement, particularly the amount of time and the degree to which these bills would be subject to amendment. The known details about the impact of the deal on specific spending bills are as follows:

  • Homeland Security and Miliatry Construction-VA: No earmarks will be included in these bills until conference, but on June 18 the House is expected to adopt a rule allowing challenges to earmarks added to bills during conference negotiations.
  • Energy-Water: No earmarks will be included in this bill, but the House will act separately on a package of earmarks to be added to the bill prior to conference.
  • The remaining nine bills: Earmarks will be included in these bills when they reach the House floor and, therefore, subject to amendment.

How and why David Obey, with a distinguished 38-year career and reputation as a reformer in Congress, insisted so long on insulating earmarks from meaningful legislative review -- particularly in view of the reform mandate the new Democratic majority rode in on after last November's elections -- has been and will continue to be the subject of speculation in Washington.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

PAYGO in a Sour Economy

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

House Definitely Maybe Returning for Lame-Duck Session

Archived Entries for Transparency

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006