Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, June 15, 2007

Draft IRS Form 990 Aims for Greater Transparency

The New York Times reports on some of the initial reactions to the 990 changes. According to IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner, the redesign of Form 990 is "the biggest thing the exempt organizations division at IRS has done in the last quarter century." The form has not been overhauled since 1979. Lerner said the new draft will be easier for most charities to fill out and provide more information. However, some may be doubtful, and expect the lengthened draft to be criticized as being burdensome. Trent Stamp, president of Charity Navigator is skeptical of what the final form will look like and what actual effects the new form will have on charities.

But without regulatory enforcement on the back-end of this new document, for organizations that aren't playing by the rules, either in their actions or their reporting responsibilities, it's just another document. It means nothing without a fear of reprisal for the outlaws, and the IRS has no plans to expand their enforcement of non-profits, just what they ask of the groups under their purported jurisdiction.

The main part of the redesign consists of a 10-page document that all nonprofit organizations would complete, "Form 990 Core," which is accompanied by 15 supporting forms called schedules. Charities would only be required to fill out certain schedules depending on the type of organization. The Chronicle of Philanthropy ($$) suggests that the "most controversial part of the proposed form may be a section that asks specific questions about whether organizations follow certain management and governance policies and practices. For example, charities are asked if they have policies on conflicts of interest, whistleblowers, and how long to keep documents and when to get rid of them." As expected, Senators Max Baucus (D-MT) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) welcome this news from the IRS. For more information, see Independent Sector and the IRS website.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Court Ruling Shows Surveillance Bill Flaws

Court Rules in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation Case

Colorado Priests Not Allowed to Make Donations to Candidates

SpeechNow.org Denied Preliminary Injunction

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

TIGTA Releases Audit of Political Activities Compliance Initiative (PACI)

Senate Holds Off on FISA

Internet Evangelist Ready to Challenge IRS Investigation

Voter ID Lawsuits Filed in Indiana

Nonprofits See Election Year Opportunity

Archived Entries for Nonprofit Accountability

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

January, 2007

November, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004