Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Friday, June 15, 2007

We Can Build Them. We Have the Technology. Safer. Lighter. More Fuel Efficient.

With Congress set to examine corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) reform this summer, the debate over vehicle fuel efficiency stringency is heating up.

Because the CAFE standard has not been strengthened since its inception over three decades ago, you would think the country would be able to get behind a stricter standard. Considering technological improvements and the gathering threat of global climate change, America would be foolish to operate with such an antiquated standard.

If you thought that, you'd be wrong. One of the biggest arguments CAFE-haters trot out is that fuel economy standards encourage automakers to produce lighter vehicles which are in turn less safe which leads to a higher rate of vehicle-crash fatalities. (For example, see this bit of nonsense from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.)

Now, a study by the International Council on Clean Transportation has fully debunked that myth. According to a press release:

The authors conclude that existing technology options can improve light-duty vehicle fuel economy by up to 50 percent over the next 10 years without reducing the weight or size of vehicles. Any extra cost associated with the auto-manufacturing changes would be more than offset by savings generated by more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The bottom line: we can achieve better fuel efficiency without sacrificing safety. According to the study, "There are a wide variety of technologies and approaches available to advance vehicle fuel economy that have no effect on vehicle safety."



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Advice on Plastics Chemical Marred by Scandal Again

Industry Ties Bind FDA Advisors

Right Whale Protection Rule Finally Here

Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

Archived Entries for Safety

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004