Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Friday, June 29, 2007

Private Tax Collection Program Remains

BNA ($) on how the private debt collection program wasn't killed yesterday:

The House passed the Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill (H.R. 2829) June 28 on a vote of 240-179 after House Democrats yielded to concerns about plans to shut down the Internal Revenue Service's private debt collection program.

Rep. Jose Serrano (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Appropriations Financial Services subcommittee, agreed to drop the language that would cut funding for the program to $1 million--$254 million below the Bush administration's request.

Republicans, led by House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Jim McCrery (R-La.), argued during debate on the House floor that eliminating the program would hamper the federal government's ability to collect tax debts and would reduce federal revenues. Because the bill also would restrict the Treasury Department's ability to raise and use revenues, McCrery said such a major change was in the jurisdiction of Ways and Means and should not be part of the appropriations bill.

Although the House Rules Committee June 26 gave Serrano the ability to waive all points of order with regard to that language, Serrano conceded that the measure should not be in the bill and agreed to strike the provision (Section 106) from the legislation.

Nonetheless, Serrano said he believed it was important to put the language in the bill and raise the issue on the House floor "so that people fully understand what it was that this subcommittee was trying to do."

Serrano said the whole idea of the language was to show that the government ought to be collecting its own money. He also objected to McCrery's argument that the provision would reduce the amount of money coming into the federal government, saying revenues would be unchanged if IRS officials were collecting the money instead of private services.

"At least historically we have had a situation where we knew that the person knocking at our door or on the phone was a member of the government, who had been trained in how to deal with the public and who fully understood what was within the law allowed in that conversation," Serrano said.



Posted by Matt Lewis



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

A Swing and a Miss on Tax Evasion

Forthcoming: EPI's The State of Working America, 2008/2009

The Executive Pay Pie: Extra Large Slices and Topped with Tax Subsidies

A Bridge for Sale: Contracting Problems Continue

Notes from the Economy: GDP, Jobless Claims

Steven Pearlstein Wants to be Shown the Money

Splitting Hairs at the Chamber of Commerce

Corporate Taxation: Only on Occasion

Annual Census Report on Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage Released

The Search Engine That Couldn't

Archived Entries for Privatization

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007