Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Friday, June 29, 2007

House Energy Legislation is a Big Disappointment

The House Energy and Commerce Committee has finished round one of its comprehensive energy legislation efforts. Unlike the Senate, the House version does not include an increase in CAFE standards, the national program for vehicle fuel efficiency.

Republicans pushed for improved CAFE standards, but Democrats defeated their efforts. Leading the charge was auto industry lobbyist veteran Michigan Democrat, Congressman John Dingell.

According to Reuters, in its current form the bill would:

require clothes washing machines, dishwashers, refrigerators and freezers to use less energy, and require more efficient light bulbs.

The bill would also provide government funding to develop plug-in electric vehicles and promote alternative fuels like ethanol.

Reg•Watch does not mean to discredit these valuable energy efficiency measures, but seriously? This is what we have waited six months for?

Speaker Pelosi promised this July 4 would be America's energy independence day. That clearly won't happen. Last November's sweeping Democratic victory is turning into a sweeping bore.

Pelosi claims to support the Senate's CAFE increase, and wants to see work on the legislation complete in both chambers by September. But this isn't good enough. The Senate's version contains a provision which would introduce cost-benefit analysis into the CAFE program for the first time. The provision could allow future administrations to block fuel efficiency increases by citing the cost to the auto industry.

If Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats want to make good on their campaign promises, they should pass strong CAFE legislation which recognizes the benefits of a cleaner environment, improved public health, and national security instead of the costs to Detroit.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act

For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"

Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers

Will New FDA Guidelines Really Reduce Conflicts of Interest?

Crane Rule Held Back by Bush Administration Ideology

Senate Passes Product Safety Bill

Archived Entries for In Congress

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004