Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Monday, July 23, 2007

USDA Sends Farm Subsidies to Deceased Landowners

Think federal regulation is just government wasting your tax dollars to meddle in your business? Well, a new GAO report suggests that lax regulatory oversight has led the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to send over one billion dollars in farm subsidies to deceased farm owners.

According to the report, issued at the behest of Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) of the Senate Finance Committee, the department continued mailing checks in the name of dead estate owners with little or no investigation, failing even to cross-reference Social Security numbers with other databases. From a sample of only 181 cases from 1999 to 2005, GAO found that officials failed to review 40 percent of payment subsidy requests and relied solely on businesses and family members to alert the agency of the deaths.

To make matters worse, the GAO report points out that in many cases, already wealthy corporate-owned farms often received these payments, and often the sums of these payments exceeded the USDA's own yearly-allotted limits to individuals. Grassley is requesting that the IRS investigate these payments to see if these estates, normally subjected to higher taxes, properly accounted for that money in tax reporting.

In its defense, the USDA cited insufficient staffing and competing priorities as the reasons for failing to conduct reviews. One can only wonder how much tax-payer money would've been saved if a few extra regulatory officials were hired. Maybe proper regulation isn't so wasteful after all.



Posted by Kyle Hatzes



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Plastics Chemical May Pose Risk, Studies Show

Bush Admin Helps Out Big Beef

Labor Department Risk Rule Officially Unveiled

Occupational Risk Rule Clears White House

With Concessions to Industry, Right Whale Rule May Be Moving

In Rare Move, White House Rubber Stamped Abortion Proposal

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Archived Entries for Oversight

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

November, 2006

September, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004