HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, July 26, 2007

If Nussle Had Baggage, His Livery Service Handled It

The tone for today's short and sweet Senate Budget Committee confirmation hearing on Jim Nussle's nomination to serve as OMB Director was set by the men who introduced him. Apparently, he was in good hands.

Rep. John Spratt (D-SC), chair of the House Budget Committee, had high praise for Nussle as an even-handed, fair-minded administrator during his six years as chair of that committee, making sure that Spratt, then the committee's ranking Democrat, and his staff had all the resources due them, even finding office space in the Cannon House Office Building basement when, Spratt recalled, they had nowhere to meet "except on the street."

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) fondly recalled the days when Nussle drove Grassley around Iowa during his 1980 Senate campaign. Since none of Grassley's five children had an interest in politics, to Grassley clear disappointment, he came to regard Nussle as a "little Grassley."

Senate Budget chair Kent Conrad (D-ND), who had previously predicted trouble for Nussle with his nomination, was so impressed with these introductions, that, after showing some flip charts depicting the woeful and worsening fiscal condition of the nation, he closed the hearing before half of the committee members had an opportunity to question Nussle.

This displeased Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM), who complained about Conrad's "early bird" policy and then asked Nussle to consider expedited funding for an energy project that Nussle had never heard of. It was not clear when the committee would re-convene to report on the Nussle nomination, but it was clear that whatever "baggage" Conrad felt Nussle might have had was ably handled ably by his introducers.

  • For Conrad's charts, click here.
  • For Conrad's opening statement and Nussle's partial response, click here.


Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Friendly Advice

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

PAYGO in a Sour Economy

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

Archived Entries for Budget Process

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

June, 2005

March, 2005