Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, July 27, 2007

Representative Pascrell: Charities Seem to Be "Painted With Wide Brush"

Reflecting once again on the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight hearing on tax-exempt organizations, a note of thanks should go out to the Council on Foundations and Representative Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) for addressing an area of great concern. During opening statements, Pascrell commented on Treasury's assertion that charities are a "significant source of terrorist funding," observing that Treasury seems to be "painting the sector with a wide brush." Steve Gunderson, the President and CEO of the Council on Foundations testified at the hearing. Gunderson's written statement submitted for the record states;

In fact, we have seen no evidence to indicate that U.S. charities are a major source of terrorist support. Out of hundreds of thousands of U.S. charities and billions of dollars given out in grants and material aid each year, only six U.S. charities are alleged to have intentionally supported terrorists. Thus far, Treasury has not identified a single case of inadvertent diversion of funds from a legitimate U.S. charity to a terrorist organization. . . . An even larger issue is that, by exaggerating the extent to which U.S. charities serve as a source of terrorist funding, Treasury is fueling an environment in which wary donors may refrain from making charitable contributions.

Following up on Pascrell's opening statement, during questions he addresses Gunderson asking if he agrees with Treasury's claim. Gunderson responds no, and explains the difficulties facing the sector as a whole. Pascrell appears confounded, emphasizing Gunderson's statement that there is no evidence and not a single U.S. charity has been found to redirect funds to a terrorist organization. The fact that these statements were made and will be included in the record is greatly appreciated. Hopefully statements such as this will broaden the attention on the issue.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Court Ruling Shows Surveillance Bill Flaws

Court Rules in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation Case

Colorado Priests Not Allowed to Make Donations to Candidates

SpeechNow.org Denied Preliminary Injunction

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

TIGTA Releases Audit of Political Activities Compliance Initiative (PACI)

Senate Holds Off on FISA

Internet Evangelist Ready to Challenge IRS Investigation

Voter ID Lawsuits Filed in Indiana

Nonprofits See Election Year Opportunity

Archived Entries for Charities and Security

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

May, 2005