Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, July 27, 2007

Pence Amendment Blocks Funds To Enforce Ban on Electioneering Communications

Late yesterday afternoon the House voted 215-205 approving Rep. Mike Pence's (R-IN) amendment to the Department of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies appropriation bill (H.R. 3093). The Pence amendment prohibits funds appropriated in the bill from being used by the Department of Justice to enforce provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) dealing with ''electioneering communications.'' The amendment does not change the ability of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to charge civil penalties. The electioneering communications section of BCRA prohibits the use of corporate or labor union funds to pay for broadcast advertisements that include the name of a federal candidate within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a general election.

Some groups have protested the amendment, writing to House Members; "The recent decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC did not overrule McConnell and did not strike down the ''electioneering communications'' provisions but rather said they were unconstitutional as applied to certain ads. As a result, the ''electioneering communications'' provisions of BCRA remain the law of the land, as limited by the WRTL decision."

The FEC is expected this summer to conduct a rulemaking to provide guidance as to what ads are still covered by the "electioneering communications" provisions and what ads are protected as a result of the WRTL decision. Considering that the Supreme Court decision addressed genuine issue ads, the question presented with the Pence amendment is whether or not to repeal the electioneering provision entirely. According to CongressDaily ($$), Pence was not sure whether it would survive a conference report, and that he only submitted the amendment to make a statement. In a press release Pence said, "Today freedom of speech prevailed on the floor of the People's House."



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Court Ruling Shows Surveillance Bill Flaws

Court Rules in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation Case

Colorado Priests Not Allowed to Make Donations to Candidates

SpeechNow.org Denied Preliminary Injunction

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

TIGTA Releases Audit of Political Activities Compliance Initiative (PACI)

Senate Holds Off on FISA

Internet Evangelist Ready to Challenge IRS Investigation

Voter ID Lawsuits Filed in Indiana

Nonprofits See Election Year Opportunity

Archived Entries for Elections and Issue Advocacy

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004