HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Monday, July 30, 2007

Schumer, Emmanuel Make Case for Carried Interest Reform Bill

According to stories carried by Bloomberg News and the New York Times today, Rep. Rahm Emmanuel (D-IL) and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) have taken a position on the carried interest tax loophole in support of equity which is commendable -- to our view -- and fully consistent with unambiguous support for closing that loophole.

In his conversations with Wall Street executives about the tax proposals, Mr. Schumer said, he has told them that he would oppose a tax increase as long as it did not also apply to other industries, like energy and real estate.

[Emmanuel] agrees with Schumer that as a matter of fairness buyout firms and hedge funds shouldn't be the only targets for punishment. Any extra burden should also be carried by oil-and-gas, venture-capital and real-estate partnerships... "Either everybody's affected, or nobody's affected."

Messrs. Emmanuel and Schumer are no doubt delighted that the only bill in Congress to close the carried interest loophole is sectorally silent -- it provides that the tax discrimination loophole regarding tax rates paid by fund managers for any sort of partnership that spins off capital gains would treat all fund managers equally, regardless of industry.

Oddly, however, the headline of Times piece -- which appeared on the front page of the paper's print edition, reads: "In Opposing Tax Plan, Schumer Breaks With Party," despite the fact that the Times called Schumer "torn" on the issue and that the leadership of neither party has taken a position as clear and supportive as Schumer's.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Friendly Advice

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

PAYGO in a Sour Economy

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003