Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Special Topics :  Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics :  Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog : 
Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog:     

Lobbying and Ethics
Reform Blog


Monday, July 30, 2007

New Lobby/Ethics Provisions Analyzed

With One Seachable/Sortable Surprise

Following up on Adam's blog, below is a closer look at and comment on the revolving door and earmarks provisions of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007.

Word is that the House will vote on the bill tomorrow; the Senate is expected to do so on Thursday.

The bill's "revolving door" provisions are as follows:

  • Senators can't lobby Congress for two years -- current law provides a one-year -- after they leave office
  • senior Senate staff and Senate officers can't lobby the entire Senate for one year, not just their former employing office, as under current law
  • no change: the current one-year cooling-off period for House members
  • prohibits senior House staff from lobbying their former office or Committee for one year after they leave House employment

The bill's main earmark process reforms -- all new -- are:

  • all earmarked spending items and tax expenditures in bills, resolutions, conference reports and managers' statements must be identified and posted on the internet at least 48 hours before a vote
  • Senators must certify that they and their immediate family will not financially benefit from any earmarks they've requested
  • new earmarks in a conference report -- i.e., not approved by either House -- are now subject to a 60-vote point of order
  • committees, to the extent technically feasible, must disclose in unclassified language the funding level and the name of sponsors earmarks in bills, joint resolutions and conference reports (emph. added)

CAVEAT: This last provision, reads as follows:

RULE XLIV, 4.(c) To the extent technically feasible, information made available on publicly accessible congressional websites under paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be provided in a searchable format.

How could providing such information in a searchable format ever not be technically feasible? In a sortable format, maybe, but searchable? That seems like an awfully and arbitrarily low standard, sticking out in this provision only like a sor(table)e thumb.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

Most Recent Entries for Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

September Argument Set In NAM Appeal

Updated LDA Guidance Including the New Form LD-203

Lobbyists Prepare for New Disclosure Reports

Lobbying Campaigns and PAC Contributions

NAM Discloses Membership Involved in Lobbying

Objection to Member Disclosure Law Continues

Member Disclosure Law Upheld, NAM To Appeal

Campaign Legal Center Updates Summary of New Lobbying and Ethics Law

Defense of Member Disclosure Law Based on Outdated Supreme Court Decision

Archived Entries for Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

July

June

May

April

March

February

December, 2007

November, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007