Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Samuelson Watch (Cont'd)

Matt did a good job this morning of giving the business to Robert Samuelson. Economist/blogger Mark Thoma weighs in as well for good measure. Thoma makes the critical point:

Samuelson seems to have completely missed the connection between health care reform and his pet column peeve, hence his claim that the problem is being ignored in the political debate when that isn't the case. In addition, Samuelson's continual focus on the budget deficit obscures the real problem. It doesn't matter whether health care is in the public domain or the private domain, the costs will be daunting either way if they continue on their present trajectory, so finding ways to hold down health care costs is where the focus needs to be.

Exactly.

Samuelson is miffed that a gang of six think tanks have been derelict in their duty to ride his personal hobby horse. He complains that three left-leaning and three right-leaning think tanks have not yet gotten together to write a single book, with each contributing 35 pages, about the horrors of the retirement of the Baby Boom generation.

It would illuminate the connections between defense spending, retirement benefits, health care, economic growth and much more. Writing for a general audience, it would favor plain English, not the usual technobabble.

His beef is that think tanks writ large have yet to address his fears. I submit that perhaps there's a good reason for this: Think tanks have in fact thought about this and concluded that long term fiscal challenges cannot be met by simply cutting Socialsecurityandmedicare benefits. It's entirely possible that think tanks have figured out that these are multidimensional, complicated issued that require multiple policy solutions that cannot be addressed in 35 pages and require big words and numbers to describe them.



Posted by Craig Jennings



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Steven Pearlstein Wants to be Shown the Money

Splitting Hairs at the Chamber of Commerce

Corporate Taxation: Only on Occasion

Annual Census Report on Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage Released

The Search Engine That Couldn't

CBO: Updated Social Security Projections

Taxing and Spending

A Billion Here, A Billion There

Gearing up for New Census Poverty Data

Maybe It's the Money

Archived Entries for Debt & Deficit

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

May, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006