Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Thursday, August 23, 2007

Attention: Organizations That Apply For USAID Funding, New Unwarranted Administrative Burden

The Washington Post reports on a very alarming notice posted in the Federal Register on July 17. All organizations and nonprofits that receive or apply for U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) funds would be required to screen all who work with the charities and provide the information to the government, this includes phone numbers, date and place of birth, e-mail addresses, nationality, gender, profession, citizenship, and government issued identification (such as social security number and passport number.) The information will be collected to make sure that no one has any connection with individuals or groups associated with terrorism. The program is outlined as the Partner Vetting System (PVS). The notice is quite vague, and it leads to a number of questions. Such as, will this some day extend to all government grantees, and what is the information being screened against? The government may deny an organization based on the collected information, but may not tell the group why; another way of saying, because the government says so. In addition, the program goes into affect the day comments are due (Aug. 27), suggesting that the agency will not take into account concerns of the nonprofit community. OMB Watch plans to submit comments. The Global Health Council also opposes the PVS.

InterAction, a coalition of U.S.-based foreign aid groups including many that receive USAID funding, will have to deal with this head on and has sent a letter to the Chief Privacy Officer at USAID asking that the plan be withdrawn. The letter also points to the other numerous concerns, such as the possible infringement upon privacy laws in other countries and the possibility that the lives of those working in some areas may be put at risk. "If they are perceived to be extension of the U.S. intelligence community, terrorist attacks against them can only increase."

The InterAction letter also addresses there has not been any verified need for the program. "USAID has not demonstrated a need for such a system. There is no evidence that USAID funds are flowing to terrorist organizations through NGOs. The Office of the Inspector General has reported repeatedly that it has found no such diversion in exercising its oversight of programs in USAID's sensitive West Bank/Gaza portfolio. Nor has it reported finding such diversions elsewhere. Neither has any other competent authority. There is no statutory basis for the PVS or any similar system outside of, arguably, the West Bank and Gaza. The fact that Congress has not required such measures elsewhere indicates the proposed system has not been deemed necessary by our national legislature. Nor is it required by Executive Order 13324."



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Citizens United Again Denied Relief from Donor Disclosure Law

FEC Complaints Against DSCC Ads

Very Troubling Proposed HHS Rule Places Restrictions on Funding

OMB Watch and Grantmakers Without Borders Releases "Collateral Damage: How the War on Terror Hurts Charities, Foundations, and the People They Serve"

Maryland State Police Accused of Spying on Peace Activists

Almost Half of the Senate Co-Sponsor of Campaign Finance Disclosure Bill

New LDA Guidance, Again

Some Hiccups in Implementing New Ethics Law

Hostility towards Voter Registration?

FISA Amendments Act of 2008 Signed Into Law

Archived Entries for Charities and Security

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

May, 2005