HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, August 28, 2007

For Regulatory Reviews, Too Many Cooks...

The Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy has launched a new program which will increase the Office's interference in federal agencies' regulatory practices — specifically, in the selection of regulations agencies choose to review after they have already taken effect.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently issued a report which describes what it calls retrospective reviews. These reviews are attempts by federal agencies to assess the effectiveness of federal regulations and identify opportunities for improvement.

Agencies may conduct these reviews for a variety of reasons. Under Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, agencies are required to perform reviews of major rules every ten years. However, the GAO report finds agencies often choose to review rules earlier, either in response to public or industry requests or at their own discretion. From reading the report, it appears as though this ad hoc method is more effective than the prescriptive Section 610 reviews.

The GAO report also finds agencies have limited time and resources to devote to regulatory reviews. What agencies don't need is more forced reviews and outside meddling from SBA or their White House cronies at OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. (OMB has engaged in a similar program during the Bush administration, strong-arming agencies into reviewing rules it finds objectionable. About 20 percent of the reviews studied by GAO were conducted at OMB's behest.)

Agencies are handling the selection of rules to review just fine on their own. Room for improvement does exist though, according to GAO. Agencies should adopt standard practices for conducting reviews, should document the reviews more thoroughly, and should improve participation by engaging the public in the review process and making results more transparent.

Agency resources would be better spent working toward those goals rather than dealing with this new SBA program.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Endangered Species Rule Sealing Bush Legacy on Warming

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Archived Entries for Rollbacks

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

March, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004