Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, October 05, 2007

House Surveillance Bill Could Be Made Public Soon

In response to the Protect America Act (PAA) signed into law in August which temporarily reformed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Democrats are now working on a new, hopefully more conscious piece of legislation to revise FISA. The House Select Intelligence Committee is scheduled to mark up a bill next Wednesday and according to CQ ($$), Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) has postponed plans to brief reporters on the bill, originally planned for today (Oct.5). Reportedly the bill would not grant retroactive liability protection to telecommunications firms that cooperated with government surveillance, a top priority for the administration, because the White House has not provided Congress with documents about those activities. House Intelligence Committee Chair Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), "said he favors a requirement that intelligence agencies secure a warrant for monitoring communications involving U.S. citizens in the United States beyond a short emergency period, even if the target of the surveillance is a foreigner located outside the country."

Reyes said the administration should be required to decide within 72 hours whether someone inside the U.S. is involved in a terrorist activity, and if so, the administration must get a warrant to continue monitoring their communications. If they are not, the monitoring activity must stop. However, it is not clear if those provisions will be in the new bill.

Civil liberties advocates are concerned that House Democrats will introduce a bill that hews too closely to the administration's desires. The Congressional Progressive Caucus, which includes 71 House Democrats, issued a statement calling for greater involvement by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in overseeing government anti-terrorism surveillance, and no "amnesty" for telecommunications companies.

Click here to read the Congressional Progressive Caucus' position on revising FISA.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Citizens United Again Denied Relief from Donor Disclosure Law

FEC Complaints Against DSCC Ads

Very Troubling Proposed HHS Rule Places Restrictions on Funding

OMB Watch and Grantmakers Without Borders Releases "Collateral Damage: How the War on Terror Hurts Charities, Foundations, and the People They Serve"

Maryland State Police Accused of Spying on Peace Activists

Almost Half of the Senate Co-Sponsor of Campaign Finance Disclosure Bill

New LDA Guidance, Again

Some Hiccups in Implementing New Ethics Law

Hostility towards Voter Registration?

FISA Amendments Act of 2008 Signed Into Law

Archived Entries for General

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005