HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, October 11, 2007

EPA's Lax Enforcement Fouls Water Too

As Reg•Watch blogged this morning, the Environmental Protection Agency is all talk when it comes to enforcement of environmental regulations. A new report from U.S. PIRG titled Troubled Waters highlights the deficiencies in EPA's enforcement of Clean Water Act regulations.

Facilities that want to discharge pollutants into navigable waterways must first receive a permit from EPA. EPA uses the permit system to limit discharges and to monitor the polluting activity of the facilities.

The report finds, "Nationally, more than 3600 major facilities (57%) exceeded their Clean Water Act permit limits at least once between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005." Furthermore, the violations tend to be significant: "Major facilities exceeding their Clean Water Act permits, on average, exceeded their permit limits by 263%, or nearly four times the allowed amount."

One problem the report cites is poor enforcement during the Bush administration. President Bush has consistently pushed budgets which slash the agency's enforcement funding. Whether it's due to a lack of funding or a lack of interest, EPA has underwhelmed in enforcing the Clean Water Act:

In 2007, the EPA Office of Inspector General reviewed 56 major facilities in long-term significant non-compliance with Clean Water Act NPDES permits between July 2002 and June 2005. The Inspector General found that EPA and states did not take suitable enforcement actions to address all of the violations at 21 of the facilities and took no enforcement actions at eight of the facilities. At 35 of the facilities reviewed, none of the enforcement actions that the Inspector General's office could assess were taken in a timely manner, leading facilities to continue to violate their permits for extended periods of time.

As Reg•Watch mentioned earlier, officials claim the agency is focusing on polluters who leave a "big environmental footprint" and on "chronic offenders who are out of compliance." Too bad they're all talk.






Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Final HHS Rule for HIV/AIDS Grantees

Bush Keeps Dudley on as Regulatory Chief

Last-Minute Ocean Conservation from Bush

Bush Takes Last-Minute Shot at Reproductive Health

Happy Friday! EPA Announces Two Major Rollbacks

Bush Backs off Clean Air Changes, Finalizes Mountaintop Mining Rule

Will Climate Change's Effect on Species Be Considered?

White House Says "No Surprises" in Last-Minute Rules

New Bush Rule Allows Guns in National Parks

Pentagon Must Clean-up Bases, Justice Department Says

Archived Entries for Enforcement

December, 2008

October, 2008

September, 2008

July, 2008

June, 2008

May, 2008

April, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

October, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

October, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

February, 2005

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004