Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, October 17, 2007

House Debating RESTORE Act for Vote Today

For 90 minutes this morning (Oct.17) the House will debate the RESTORE Act, HR 3773, the surveillance bill meant to fix some of the problems with the Protect America Act (PAA), amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Yesterday the Rules committee decided to go ahead with floor consideration of the bill without allowing lawmakers the chance to try to alter it. The only changes allowed have already occurred, with combining the two slightly different versions approved by the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees last week. Additionally, an amendment will be included in the rule for floor debate that would allow a court to issue temporary surveillance orders when an application is under appeal. It would also require any administration request for assistance from telecommunications companies to cite the section of law with which it is in compliance.

During the Rules Committee numerous amendments were blocked much like those offered during the mark up hearings last week. One would have offered retroactive legal immunity to companies that participated in the National Security Agency's surveillance program. Unfortunately an amendment that would have required individual warrants for communications where one party is a U.S. citizen was also voted down.

The Bush administration has threatened to veto the bill if it passes in its current form. In a statement issued Oct.16; "The bill does not result in permanent FISA modernization and it contains no retroactive liability provision. H.R. 3773 therefore falls far short of providing the Intelligence Community with the tools it needs to collect foreign intelligence effectively from individuals located outside the United States."

Civil libertarian groups have split. The ACLU has come out in opposition to the RESTORE Act, while other groups though realizing that the bill is not perfect, support the bill for the improvements from current law. The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Center for National Security Studies are urging passage of the bill. Importantly, the RESTORE Act increases some oversight of the program absent in the PAA.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Gary Bass Featured in Philanthropy News Digest on the Support of Nonprofit Advocacy

Court Ruling Shows Surveillance Bill Flaws

Court Rules in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation Case

Colorado Priests Not Allowed to Make Donations to Candidates

SpeechNow.org Denied Preliminary Injunction

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

TIGTA Releases Audit of Political Activities Compliance Initiative (PACI)

Senate Holds Off on FISA

Internet Evangelist Ready to Challenge IRS Investigation

Voter ID Lawsuits Filed in Indiana

Archived Entries for General

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005