Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, November 15, 2007

Fear and Spending

One of the more disturbing aspects of the spending debate has been the President's reliance on scare tactics. Essentially, Congress has not given him a big enough target, so he must conjure one up.

He calls the tobacco tax "habit-forming," while closing the carried interest loophole will raise everyone's taxes. He says that Congress wants to spend over $200 billion more than he would with this year's appropriations bills. SCHIP will ineluctably bring us down the path to "socialized" medicine.

But SCHIP is a small program for children's health, not socialized medicine. The only spending this year's appropriations bills will do is this year's spending- that's a $22 billion difference. Carried interest has nothing to do with 99 percent of all taxpayers, and tax increases aren't drugs.

The basic point is that the President and his backers are not interested in the policy- they're interested in scaring the public. Capitulating to the President, I think, will legitimize this fear. If offered a compromise, the President will be able to tell the public that he kept the Democratic majority from spending $200 billion, from socializing medicine, taxing everyone, and so on. It will appear as if the Democrats had given the President the giant target he wanted, and were forced to come down from it.

Congress should stand up to the President. They should stand up for their modest spending requests and tax proposals. They should not give an inch unless the President and his backers begin to speak substantively about policy differences. I'm not holding my breath, though.



Posted by Matt Lewis



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

CBO Projects Largest Deficit in History

The Cost of TARP, Dollars and Opportunity

House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill

Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal

FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind

Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict

Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout

Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill

Under the Radar: Congress Finishes FY 2009 Approps

Next Move After House Fails to Pass Wall Street Bailout Uncertain

Archived Entries for Appropriations & Spending

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

July, 2004

June, 2004

May, 2004

April, 2004

March, 2004

February, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003