Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, January 15, 2008

FDA Backs Meat and Milk from Clones; Where's USDA?

The Washington Post has obtained a copy of an FDA risk assessment that endorses the safety of food from cloned cattle, pigs, and goats. The assessment, long expected, comes on the heels of a European Union draft scientific opinion which came to similar conclusions. The Post has a summary of and excerpts from the risk assessment and background on the issue in an article published today.

Usually a risk assessment is an early stage of the regulatory process that informs officials responsible for making the ultimate decision. But in this case, the federal government does not need to regulate to allow food production from clones because there is currently a "voluntary moratorium," according to the Post. With FDA's endorsement, the agricultural industry may move more quickly with food production stemming from cloned animals.

According to the Post, FDA will be monitoring cloned animals should production increase:

Looking ahead, the report says FDA is collaborating with veterinary and scientific organizations, notably the International Embryo Transfer Society, to create a database on the health of new clones, which will help the agency track the field as the industry grows.

As the debate on cloned animals will surely continue, FDA should make this information publicly available.

Interestingly, neither the article nor the selected excerpts from the risk assessment mention USDA, the federal body in charge of monitoring and inspecting livestock and regulating meat products. Maybe it is more appropriate for FDA to conduct the risk assessment, but the continued safety of the nation's supply will depend on the work of inspectors in the field. Hopefully, FDA consulted USDA.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health

White House, EPA Protecting Rocket Fuel Polluters

Pentagon Won't Clean up Its Messes

Lawmakers Unhappy with Workplace Risk Rule

Archived Entries for Public Health

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004