Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Wednesday, January 16, 2008

House Nearing Passage of Mine Safety Bill

The House is nearing passing of a bill that would tighten safety standards for miners and expand the enforcement authority of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), according to CQ Politics.

The bill is a follow up to the MINER Act which passed in 2006 after the Sago and Darby mine disasters. George Miller (D-CA), chairman of the House Education and Labor committee and champion of the bill, believes continuing mine safety problems and collapses like the one in Crandall Canyon Utah last year warrant additional Congressional action.

The White House Office of Management and Budget issued a veto threat of the bill yesterday. OMB says the bill would undermine progress being made in implementing the MINER Act and, in some cases, would actually make mines less safe.

That seems unlikely, especially since the United Mine Workers (the major union for miners) supports the bill.

If the bill also passes the Senate, it is unclear whether Democrats will be able to rally enough votes to override a Bush veto. According to CQ Politics, some House Republicans oppose the bill:

Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon , R-Calif., slammed the bill as "premature at best," adding it "ignores the progress that has been made." He urged adoption of a GOP substitute that would strip the new fines, earlier timelines and stricter safety requirements from the bill.

Judging by that description, the Republican bill must be a few blank sheets of paper.

Update: The House passed the bill in a 214-199 vote.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Occupational Risk Rule Clears White House

With Concessions to Industry, Right Whale Rule May Be Moving

In Rare Move, White House Rubber Stamped Abortion Proposal

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act

For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"

Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers

Archived Entries for Safety

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004