Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, January 31, 2008

JCT Website Review, Pt. 2

The Joint Committee's on Taxation's new website, which was rolled out this week, brings the mysterious methodologies of revenues estimates into clearer view. "Inside the JCT Revenue Estimating Process," a 26-page point point presentation by the JCT Chief of Staff reads like a pitch, with descriptions of tax models and application examples, the staff's access to 180,000 tax returns (enabling the Committee to create a "virtual world of American economic activity'), and a defense of its "Fixed GNP COnstraint" approach.

A flowchart is provided on page 17 entitled "JCT Quality Control and Process," which shows the various levels of input and review that goes into each revenue estimate. If you've ever seen the JCT anaylsis letters that accompany their estimates, they are impressively sophisticated.

But there is something missing from the materials that is probably important for members, staff, and the general public to know. The Committee claims that it "handle[d] 7,800 revenue estimate request in 2007" (p. 3). It published only 121 of these; only those referred to in public reports are published. So it completes some number of estimates over and above this number, but its staff of about three dozen can't possible do all that is requested of it. The website should explain:

  • How many of the estimate requests it receives does it undertake?
  • How does it decide which to undertake?
  • How and when does it communicate its decisions regarding which to undertake?

The website is a good deal more readable and some information previously unavailable to the public is included in it. But to be fully accountable and transparent in its process and method -- to the degree it can be, given that it performs its tasks for and provides its product to members of Congress only -- is should explain how it decides which of the small fraction of the nearly 8,000 estimate requests it gets it decides to perform.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

America Continues to Drown in Debt

Byrd Postpones Second Supplemental, Two Other Approps Bills

JEC Ranking Member Highlights Troubling Trend in Income Inequality

Claims of "Magical" Tax Cuts Continue

Talk About Low Expectations

Bloch Deputy: Very Existence of the Office of Special Counsel "At Risk"

New CBO Report Shows Dire Consequences of Bush Tax Cuts, AMT Patching

Average Earnings Down for All Workers, Median Earnings Also Down for Full-Time Workers

Republicans Inch Toward Fiscal Responsibility

Stimulus Part Deux: Coming to Congress Near You

Archived Entries for Transparency

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006