HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Thursday, February 07, 2008

Budget Reform Proposals-in-Wonderland

Once again this year, the president's budget includes a set of budget reform proposals, not substantially changed from the proposals put forth in the same space in years past (evaluated here). Among the highlights:

  • Joint Budget Resolution: The President's budget advocates a joint budget resolution requiring the President's signature. Of course, this would give the Budget Resolution the force of law, meaning that Congress would effectively set the level of appropriations bills.
  • Line-Item Veto: George Will has the last word...

    The word "veto" is not in the Constitution. It says "every bill" passed by both houses of Congress must be "presented" to the president, who must sign "it" or return "it" to Congress. The antecedent of the pronoun is the entire bill, not bits of it. As President George Washington understood: "I must approve all the parts of a bill, or reject it in toto."

  • One-Way PAYGO: Any increase in the cost of entitlement programs, such as Medicaid, Medicare, or Food Stamps, would have to be paid for by cuts in other services. The rules would prohibit financing improvements in these programs by raising revenue—for example, by closing tax loopholes; meanwhile, the cost of new tax cuts would not have to be paid for
  • Selective Sequestration: Discretionary spending levels would be frozen at the levels proposed in the FY09 budget, resulting in real cuts in spending in the outyears; legislation enacted that exceeds this cap, would trigger a "sequester," or an automatic reduction, in non-exempt discretionary programs

Don't expect any of these proposals to go anywhere. The administration made only token efforts to lobby for them in Congress over the years, even when Republicans ruled the roost there.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Better News for Workers

Legistorm Launches Searchable Earmarks Website

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

PAYGO in a Sour Economy

Orszag to head up OMB?

Change We Can Believe In?

Grassley Asks Treasury IG to Look Into Tax Rule Change

Time to Get Tough on the Swiss

Treasury Overrides Congress Through Fiat, Giving Banks $140 Billion in Tax Breaks

House Definitely Maybe Returning for Lame-Duck Session

Archived Entries for Budget Process

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

June, 2005

March, 2005