Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Friday, February 08, 2008

Uncertainty over Plastics Chemical -- Legitimate or Contrived?

Rep. John Dingell's Energy and Commerce Committee recently began an investigation into the use and safety of bisphenol-A, a chemical commonly found in a host of consumer products including plastic bottles. In a Feb. 6 article, ABC News reporter Justin Rood provides an update on exactly what the committee has been looking into.

According to the article, Dingell is particularly concerned with the work of scientific consultants. The article discusses one of those consultants, the Weinberg Group, which may be designing its scientific research in order to produce conclusions about bisphenol-A that downplay the negative effects of the chemical: "The Weinberg Group may play a role in arranging just the kinds of expert panels and scientific research the chemical industry points to in defense of its products, Dingell suggested."

The charges against the Weinberg Group are similar to those made against Sciences International, a contractor who the National Toxicology Program was paying to investigate the effects of bisphenol-A on reproductive health. (More on that here.) The Weinberg Group is not listed as a recipient of federal contracts or grants, according to FedSpending.org.

The scientific uncertainty surrounding bisphenol-A for years has prevented meaningful government intervention. Not only has use of the chemical gone unabated in consumer products, the public is in the dark as to which consumer products might contain bisphenol-A and what the ramifications might be.

At the very least, the public deserves to know the full set of facts about bisphenol-A and the companies who use it.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Plastics Chemical May Pose Risk, Studies Show

Bush Admin Helps Out Big Beef

Labor Department Risk Rule Officially Unveiled

Occupational Risk Rule Clears White House

With Concessions to Industry, Right Whale Rule May Be Moving

In Rare Move, White House Rubber Stamped Abortion Proposal

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Archived Entries for Oversight

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

November, 2006

September, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

April, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004