Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Friday, February 22, 2008

527 Turns to Wisconsin Right to Life Case for Support

Relying on the Wisconsin Right to Life (WRTL) decision, a newly formed 527 committee argues that they can broadcast their ads, and that under WRTL the pieces are issue advocacy. The 527, the American Leadership Project (ALP), claims that it will not engage in express advocacy and will focus its efforts on issues that are important to the middle class such as the economy.

Meanwhile, Bob Bauer (also Senator Barack Obama's lawyer) at moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com argues that their actions violate federal campaign finance law and the group should be considered a political committee.

It is questionable if this ad titled "Tell Hillary to Keep Working" from ALP could in fact subject to an "interpretation other than as an appeal to vote for or against a candidate." It appears to be very supportive of Senator Clinton's candidacy.

ALP spokesman Roger Salaazar stated; "We are not going to be airing any advertisements that contain express advocacy on behalf of a federal candidate. These are issue ads that focus on issues that are important to the middle class."

According to the election law blog, the ad "is exactly the kind of election-related speech that the Roberts Court seemed to bless with a huge exemption in WRTL." Given that it is unclear whether or not it is issue advocacy, that statement is also questionable.

Whether a group engaged in express advocacy can spend an unlimited amount of money is the subject of the SpeechNow.org case. Read OMB Watch coverage of the SpeechNow.org case here.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Court Rules in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation Case

Colorado Priests Not Allowed to Make Donations to Candidates

SpeechNow.org Denied Preliminary Injunction

Forms and Instructions for LD-203 Released

TIGTA Releases Audit of Political Activities Compliance Initiative (PACI)

Senate Holds Off on FISA

Internet Evangelist Ready to Challenge IRS Investigation

Voter ID Lawsuits Filed in Indiana

Nonprofits See Election Year Opportunity

All FEC Nominees Finally Confirmed

Archived Entries for Speech and Lobbying Rights

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004