Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Monday, February 25, 2008

What's in a Word?

Save 'Stimulus' for When We Really Need It

Word is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) may 'fast-track' S. 2636, the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (text) to the Senate floor this week.

The bill provides $200 million for pre-foreclosure counselling, authorization for state housing finance authorities to issue $10 billion in additional mortgage revenue bonds to refinance subprime loans and provide mortgages for first-time home buyers, and court-supervised modification of home mortgages in bankruptcy -- all good things, though this last one is a controversial provision which might end up defeating the bill.

But not if S. 2636 can be sold as a stimulus measure (or bought as one: see the Wall Street Journal's Democrats Plan Housing-Related Stimulus Bill").

After all, if a $168 billion deficit-financed stimulus package could fly through Congress and get signed by the president in under a month, why shouldn't a practically no-cost stimulus package targeted at the economy's most distressed sector fare just as well? Answer (taking up our query of last week): if it's not really a stimulus measure.

The foregoing is not meant as criticism of S. 2636. It's meant instead to conserve the political capital to support genuine additional stimulus measures, should they become necessary -- measures that increase aggregate demand so as to avoid or reduce the odds of an economic recession. Use that capital now on a worthy bill that provides no stimulus and risk losing it for later when the economy might really need it.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

Notes from the Economy: Jobs and Unemployment

Transparency Act Legacy Spreads to the States

Talk of a Lame Duck Session

Bush Admin Helps Out Big Beef

Bush Admin Takes Aim at Unionization

CBPP: Taxes on the Rich Don't Hurt Small Businesses

A Swing and a Miss on Tax Evasion

Forthcoming: EPI's The State of Working America, 2008/2009

The Executive Pay Pie: Extra Large Slices and Topped with Tax Subsidies

A Bridge for Sale: Contracting Problems Continue

Archived Entries for Appropriations & Spending

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

July, 2004

June, 2004

May, 2004

April, 2004

March, 2004

February, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003