Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Wednesday, February 27, 2008

OK Corral May Gain National Park Status

The Bush administration will likely spend its last year in power trying to accomplish through regulation what it cannot accomplish legislatively. Associated Press reporter Matthew Daly (via GovExec.com) portends another of these 11th hour administrative changes:

Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said Friday that his department will review gun laws on lands administered by the National Park Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service. Officials will draw up new rules by April 30 for public comment, Kempthorne said in a letter to 50 senators who requested the review.

The National Rifle Association and other gun-rights advocates hailed the announcement as the first step to relax a decades-old ban on bringing loaded firearms into national parks.

Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) called the regulations "inconsistent." According to the article, "Crapo and other lawmakers had complained to Kempthorne that the existing guidelines were 'confusing, burdensome and unnecessary.' "

First, what is confusing about the existing regulations? Loaded guns are not allowed in national parks. If that confuses you, it is probably not appropriate for you to even have a gun in the first place.

Second, if anything is unnecessary, it's a gun in a national park. Citizens are not allowed to shoot things in national parks. Even if Interior changes the rules and allows guns in national parks, no one will be legally allowed to use them. A rule change would only serve to add unnecessary risk in areas where enjoyment and relaxation should be paramount.

The Coalition of National Park Service Retirees and other organizations are adamantly opposed to the rule change: "The groups say current regulations requiring that visitors to national parks render their weapons inaccessible were working and have made national parks among the safest places in America."

But, with the clock is running out on Bush, the National Park Service Retirees will take a back seat to the National Rifle Association every time.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Is the Bush Administration Meddling with Risk Assessments?

White House Blocks Effort to Clean Up Pesticide Containers

Senate Moves Bill to Renew Federal Improvement Panel

After Preemption Row, Roof Strength Rule Delayed

Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety

Regulatory Attacks on Medicaid Halted

OMB Shutting Out EPA on CO2 Regulation

Bush Regulatory Gatekeepers on House Chopping Block

Lobbyists Opposing FDA Changes

It All Depends on Who You Ask

Archived Entries for Rollbacks

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

March, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004