Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo
Home :  Special Topics :  Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics :  Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog : 
Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog:     

Lobbying and Ethics
Reform Blog


Wednesday, March 12, 2008

House Approves Outside Ethics Panel

With a vote of 229 to 182, the House passed H.Res. 895 to create a new independent panel, the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE). The new body will be able to initiate investigations of possible misconduct. Those who opposed creating the panel charged that it would encourage partisan complaints. After a proposal was pulled from the floor twice recently with clear bipartisan doubts, chairman of the ethics task force Representative Michael Capuano (D-MA) made changes to alleviate some concerns. For example, an investigation can only begin when one panel member appointed by the speaker and another by the minority leader agree.

The New York Times reports that "creating a panel of six people of 'exceptional public standing,' the House, for the first time, delegated the authority for regulating behavior in the House to nonlawmakers. Current members of the House, federal employees and anyone who has been a registered lobbyist in the past year would be ineligible."

Overall, the new Office of Congressional Ethics was sought to strengthen the internal ethics review process, and as a response to the voters' view of an unethical Congress. As Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) commented; "[During the last election] you know what the people thought about this, the People's House that we love. And that, my friends, is why we're in the majority. Because the people thought changes were necessary in this House. The people asked for change. They asked for accountability."



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

Most Recent Entries for Lobbying and Ethics Reform Blog

Lobbyists Prepare for New Disclosure Reports

Lobbying Campaigns and PAC Contributions

NAM Discloses Membership Involved in Lobbying

Objection to Member Disclosure Law Continues

Member Disclosure Law Upheld, NAM To Appeal

Campaign Legal Center Updates Summary of New Lobbying and Ethics Law

Defense of Member Disclosure Law Based on Outdated Supreme Court Decision

House Approves Outside Ethics Panel

A Year Has Gone By and Still No Vote on a Change to House Ethics Enforcement

Amicus Briefs Filed in Challenge to Member Disclosure Law

Archived Entries for Lobbying Reform & Government Ethics

May

April

March

February

December, 2007

November, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007