Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Baucus Continues Quest to Drive Up Deficits

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, reiterated yesterday that the one-year adjustment to prevent the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) from impacting millions of additional taxpayers this year will not be paid for - ensuring an additional $70 billion will be added to the deficit. Depsite the decision by House leaders to include a special provision in their version of the budget resolution (called "reconciliation instructions") that would protect a paid-for patch from being filibustered in the Senate, Baucus and other Senate leaders (including Senate Budget Committee Chairman and all-around good guy Kent Conrad (D-ND)) seem to not even want to try to pay for the AMT. BNA reports ($):

Many Senate Republicans expressed opposition to the reconciliation instructions, saying they were meant to bully the Senate into accepting a paid-for patch.

But Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) told BNA late March 13 that while he believes reconciliation instructions will be in the final resolution, he does not believe Congress will pay for the patch because like in 2007, while he would prefer it to be offset, that is not the will of the Senate.

"I don't think we'll pay for it," Baucus said in between votes on the Senate floor. "AMT is not going to be paid for. Everybody wants to do an AMT patch and AMT will not be paid for."

What's the point of being in the majority if Democrats are not going to get serious about one of their main priorities - fiscal responsibility? Can't they at least try?

Image by Flickr user stgermh used under a Creative Commons license



Posted by Adam Hughes



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

CBO Projects Largest Deficit in History

The Cost of TARP, Dollars and Opportunity

House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill

Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal

FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind

Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict

Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout

Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill

Under the Radar: Congress Finishes FY 2009 Approps

Next Move After House Fails to Pass Wall Street Bailout Uncertain

Archived Entries for Debt & Deficit

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

May, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006