Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, April 24, 2008

House Moves Bill to Stop Medicaid Changes

Yesterday the House passed a bill that would stop the Bush administration from going forward with several regulations intended to cut Medicaid services. The administration developed the regulations under the guise of "fiscal integrity," arguing state Medicaid programs are using loopholes to inappropriately claim federal funds. Bush has threatened to veto the bill.

Fortunately, the bill passed the House in a 349-62 vote which, if the margin holds, would be enough to override a veto. State governments also support the bill. According to the Associated Press, "The governors of all 50 states…oppose the rules."

If all this bipartisanship and widespread agreement make you uncomfortable, fear not — the U.S. Senate is on the case.

The bill will now move to the Senate Finance Committee where ranking member Charles Grassley (R-IA) is railing against it. (Grassley also has the support of the Senate's Republican leadership.) The AP reports:

"It is an absolute farce for anyone to argue that all of those dollars are being appropriately spent and that Congress ought to just walk away from these issues," [Grassley] said in a recent speech. He said the Finance Committee should fix the problems "instead of just making the regulations go away."

Of course, the true farce would be to shift to state governments a $21 billion burden over the next five years and jeopardize health services for thousands, all because of the impropriety of a few state Medicaid programs. Here are some of the policies Grassley thinks Congress should be supporting [Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities]:

  • "The regulations will significantly limit Medicaid coverage for rehabilitation services provided to people with serious mental illness."
  • "The regulations will eliminate coverage for therapeutic foster care, in which children are placed in a private home with foster parents who are specially trained to help them improve a child's condition."
  • "The regulations will eliminate coverage for "day habilitation" programs, which are designed to help people with intellectual disabilities (formerly called mental retardation) and other developmental disabilities to acquire the skills they need to live in community-based settings and remain out of institutions."
  • "[T]he regulations will likely increase the number of poor children who are eligible for Medicaid but remain uninsured, as well as the number of children with Medicaid coverage who do not get certain health care services they need."

If Grassley thinks his Committee should fix the problem of improper Medicaid reimbursement, he should use his position as ranking member to do just that, and not to cut health services. Unfortunately for him, under parliamentary procedures, inane complaining cannot be substituted for introducing legislation.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Is the Bush Administration Meddling with Risk Assessments?

White House Blocks Effort to Clean Up Pesticide Containers

Senate Moves Bill to Renew Federal Improvement Panel

After Preemption Row, Roof Strength Rule Delayed

Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety

Regulatory Attacks on Medicaid Halted

OMB Shutting Out EPA on CO2 Regulation

Bush Regulatory Gatekeepers on House Chopping Block

Lobbyists Opposing FDA Changes

It All Depends on Who You Ask

Archived Entries for In Congress

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004