Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, May 20, 2008

White House Thwarted State Efforts on CO2 Emissions

An investigation by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee shows that the White House pressured the Environmental Protection Agency to refuse a request by the state of California to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

In December, EPA denied a California petition, or waiver, that would have allowed the state to set standards for greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. Under the Clean Air Act, only the federal government may regulate vehicle emissions; but California — and only California — may request permission to set up its own regulatory scheme. If EPA grants California permission (as it had with every request prior to this one), other states may choose between California's program and the federal program. At least 15 other states were prepared to follow California's plan, if permitted.

When EPA announced the denial, Administrator Stephen Johnson claimed the decision was his alone. But the denial of the California petition had the White House's fingerprints all over it. Last fall, Vice President Dick Cheney met with executives from Ford and Chrysler who urged him to deny the request, according to the investigation. The White House Council on Environmental Quality (along with the Transportation Department) lobbied U.S. representatives and governors urging them to oppose California's efforts.

At the time of the announcement, no hard evidence existed to refute Johnson's claim that he, and not the White House, was responsible for the denial. The deposition of an EPA assistant administrator, taken by the House investigators, begins to shed some light on who was actually responsible for the decision.

Committee investigators heard from EPA Associate Deputy Administrator Jason Burnett, whose carefully chosen words nonetheless cast doubts on Johnson's claim that the Dec. 19 decision to deny the waiver was his alone:

According to Mr. Burnett, Administrator Johnson's preference for a full or partial grant of the waiver did not change until after he communicated with the White House about the matter. When asked by Committee staff "whether the Administrator communicated with the White House in between his preference to do a partial grant and the ultimate decision" to deny the waiver, Mr. Burnett responded: "I believe the answer is yes." When asked "after his communications with the White House, did he still support granting the waiver in part," Mr. Burnett answered: "He ultimately decided to deny the waiver." Mr. Burnett also affirmed that there was "White House input into the rationale in the December 19th letter."

Unfortunately, we still don't know which White House offices or officials pressured EPA. Burnett repeatedly refused to answer the committee's questions on who communicated with EPA or what exactly was discussed. Burnett informed the committee he was under instruction from senior EPA officials to keep that information under wraps.

Check out the Committee's investigation and supporting documents here.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

New Website Highlights Old Office of Technology Assessment

For Mysterious Occupational Risk Rule, Shenanigans Abound

Find out How Much You're Worth. Take our Trip around the Beltway.

On Consumer Product Bill, More Work Remains

Will Congress Wrap Up Consumer Safety Bill?

Bush Administration Says Americans Are Worth Less

Lawmakers Probe on Occupational Risk Rulemaking

Bush Administration Will Ignore Its Own Notice on CO2 Emissions

On Food Tracking, FDA Says "Not Our Responsibility"

America's Wetlands Sullied by Supreme Court Decision

Archived Entries for In the White House

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

August, 2004