HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, June 05, 2008

Preemption Provision in Roof Strength Rule Criticized

In August 2005, the Department of Transportation proposed a badly-needed update to its 1971 standard for roof strength in passenger vehicles. According to the nonprofit group Public Citizen, the regulation would save 13 to 44 lives every year (out of about 10,000 rollover-related deaths).

The proposed rule is weak on its merits. Critics charge the rule is too weak to make a marked improvement in vehicle safety and does not require automakers to adopt readily available technology that would significantly increase roof strength. (Check out Public Citizen for more.)

But a troubling provision in the proposal makes it even worse by limiting the rights of all rollover crash victims. DOT's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) included language that would preempt the rights of victims to bring damages claims against automakers.

Yesterday, a Senate panel grilled a NHTSA official on the preemption language, and senators from both parties urged the agency to abandon it. Congress Daily (subscription) reports:

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., charged that pre-emption language had been cropping up "like spring flowers" in Bush administration rule-making proposals over the past year, and added that "we in Congress are pretty upset about it."

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., appeared as a witness at the hearing. He chided NHTSA for not offering "any explanation for why the rights of a vehicle purchaser to seek a common-law remedy for harm done to them should be taken away."

Federal agencies are responsible for enforcing the positive law enacted by Congress. However, even when positive laws and regulations work, citizens must have an opportunity to seek legal redress if a product causes harm. Tort law provides that opportunity by allowing citizens to seek damages from the makers of those products.

When the Bush administration tries to preempt tort law through regulation, as it has frequently attempted, it is conflating two different types of law — and doing so to the detriment of the public.

NHTSA may finish work on the rule as early as July 1.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Science Advisors Chide FDA on Plastics Chemical

Archived Entries for Safety

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004