HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Groups Call For the Rejection of FISA Legislation Proposed by Senator Bond

The ranking member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senator Christopher Bond (R-MO) has put out what he considers a compromise on surveillance legislation to revise the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). OMB Watch signed on to a coalition letter strongly opposing this "compromise."

"The Bond proposal does incorporate a few improvements, including an audit of illegal warrantless surveillance and a provision reaffirming that FISA is the exclusive means by which foreign intelligence surveillance can lawfully be conducted in the United States. But these modest concessions do not offset the vast new unchecked surveillance powers the bill confers on the government."

In addition, Senators Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Chris Dodd (D-CT) are urging those working to finalize the FISA Amendments Act to include provisions that protect the privacy of Americans and not to grant retroactive immunity to companies that allegedly cooperated in the illegal warrantless wiretapping program. Bond's proposal would give the FISA court the authority to decide whether to grant retroactive legal immunity for telecommunications companies. Feingold and Dodd sent a letter to Democratic leaders stating, "under the Bond proposal, the result of the FISA Court's evaluation would be predetermined. Regardless of how much information it is permitted to review, what standard of review is employed, how open the proceedings are, and what role the plaintiffs' lawyers are permitted to play, the FISA Court would be required to grant immunity. To agree to such a proposal would not represent a reasonable compromise."



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Editorial Calls for Total Transparency by Lobbyists

Report Finds U.S. Aid Not Regularly Impartial

More Information Released on the Surveillance on Nonviolent Activists in MD

Reform Recommendations for Security Laws Impacting Charities and Foundations

Citizens United Case Goes to Supreme Court

Georgia GOP Seeking to Shorten Early Voting

Lobbying and 501(c)(3)'s

Rules for Lobbyists in Transition

More Foundations are Using Funds to Influence Public Policy

Brennan Center for Justice Proposes Universal Voter Registration

Archived Entries for Charities and Security

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

May, 2005