HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Occupational Risk Rule Clears White House

The White House has approved a controversial rule that would change the way occupational health agencies calculate on-the-job risks. The rule cleared the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs yesterday.

According to OIRA's website, the office approved the rule "consistent with change." That's the most common designation OIRA uses to summarize its review of agency regulations. Basically, consistent with change means OIRA has done some meddling with and editing of the rule, but the big picture remains the same.

Approval by OIRA — a politically-minded office inside the White House that is responsible for reviewing and approving agency policy — does not come as a surprise. The rule, which the office of Labor Secretary Elaine Chao is pushing without the consultation of her department's occupational health experts, would create a system that downplays occupational risks in order to weaken the argument in favor of workplace regulations. Such a policy is consistent with the Bush White House's disdain for regulation. (OMB Watch has more on the rule here.)

The next step in the process is formal publication of the proposal in the Federal Register. The Department of Labor may borrow the strategy of other federal departments that have been trying to rush through other bad regulations. The departments of Health and Human Services and Interior both recently proposed new rules but only allowed for 30 days of public comment. (The standard is 60 days.) Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for updates.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Endangered Species Rule Sealing Bush Legacy on Warming

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Archived Entries for In the White House

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

August, 2004