Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Monday, June 20, 2005

Mad about mad cow

The USDA promised 18 months ago to close a loophole in current policy that could let mad cow disease sneak through. To prevent mad cow, we must stop feeding cows tissue and blood from other cows; the loophole is that cattle are fed chicken litter (from chickens that, in turn, have been fed cow blood and other cattle proteins), cattle blood, and restaurant leftovers, all of which could transmit the deformed protein (or prion) that causes mad cow disease.

The loophole has not yet been closed. "Once the cameras were turned off and the media coverage dissipated, then it's been business as usual, no real reform, just keep feeding slaughterhouse waste," said John Stauber, an activist and co-author of Mad Cow USA: Could the Nightmare Happen Here?, to the Associated Press. Stauber adds, "The entire U.S. policy is designed to protect the livestock industry's access to slaughterhouse waste as cheap feed."

Given that we may have a second case of mad cow in the U.S., the issue deserves more than what Rep. Rosa DeLauro describes as "a lot of talk, a lot of press releases, and no action."

Government inaction on mad cow may well stretch back to the early to mid 1990s. Federal investigators have been probing allegations from a former USDA veterinarian that the USDA was covering up concnerns about mad cow from the very beginning of USDA's mad cow surveillance program in 1990. Moreover, Canadian news uncovered recently that the USDA may have mishandled two 1997 tests of suspected mad cow. In one, an independent university lab concluded that the cow "had a rare brain disorder never reported in that breed of cattle either before or since – not the dreaded bovine spongiform encephalopathy." CBC discovered, however, that "key areas of the brain where signs of BSE would be most noticeable were never tested. The most important samples somehow went missing."

Posted by Robert Shull



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act

For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"

Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers

Will New FDA Guidelines Really Reduce Conflicts of Interest?

Crane Rule Held Back by Bush Administration Ideology

Senate Passes Product Safety Bill

Archived Entries for Public Health

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004