Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Friday, August 12, 2005

OIRA meets over MSHA Diesel Rule

OIRA and the Department of Labor met with representatives from the National Mining Association, FMC Corporation (a major chemical producer), as well as a lobbyist from Patton Boggs over the Mine Safety and Health Administration's diesel rule.

On June 6, MSHA published the Diesel Particulate Matter Exposure of Underground Metal and Nonmetal Miners Rule. The rule changes the way MSHA calculates diesel particulate matter emission limits in underground mines. According to the agency, the new calculations, based on permissible exposure limits measured by elemental carbon, are comparable to the former measurements, which measured limits based on total carbon emissions. In comments filed on behalf of the United Mine Workers of America, however, Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International senior scientist James Weeks points out that the new emissions standards are actually weaker than the older standards. By basing emission standards on elemental carbon rather than total carbon emissions, the new emissions standard will no longer capture the hundred of organic compounds combined with diesel particulate matter, many of which are carcinogenic.

The new regulation also contains other provisions that weaken the protection and could ultimately render the regulation impotent. Mines will be able to receive an unlimited number of one-year special extensions, administered by an MSHA district manager. Moreover, the new regulation now requires the agency to consider economic feasibility rather than just technical feasibility when considering special extensions for compliance with the rule. This new provision could open a floodgate of special extensions that will allow mines to avoid implementing the emissions standards altogether.

MSHA originally established the health standard using total carbon emissions on Jan. 19, 2001. Industry challenged the rule and organized labor intervened. The settlement agreement that followed required MSHA to promulgate a further series of rules addressing specific issues, including several that are addressed in this rulemaking. The new standard is an interim final rule. MSHA is required to create a more stringent standard in 2006, revising the concentration limit to 160 micrograms per cubic meter of air.

Read comments on the regulation by the United Mine Workers of America and the Center for Progressive Reform.

Posted by Genevieve Smith



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Industry Ties Bind FDA Advisors

Right Whale Protection Rule Finally Here

Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health

Archived Entries for In the White House

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

August, 2004