Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Overtime: Hazardous to Your Health

BNA's subscription-only Daily Report for Executives got a sneak peek at the September issue of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, which will publish a report addressing the health and safety consequences of working overtime. According to BNA, the study "found that working in jobs with schedules that routinely involved overtime work or extended hours increased the risk of a job-related injury or illness." Moreover, "[w]orking overtime was associated with a 61 percent higher injury hazard rate when compared with jobs that did not involve overtime."

More from the BNA snapshot of the study:

"The results of this study suggest that jobs with long working hours are not more risky merely because they are concentrated in inherently hazardous industries or occupations, or because of the demographic characteristics of employees working those schedules," the report said. "Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that long working hours indirectly precipitate workplace accidents through a causal process, for instance by increasing fatigue or stress in affected workers."

The study on long work hours also found:

  • Overtime schedules had the greatest relative risk of occupational injury or illness, followed by schedules of 12 or more hours per day and those of 60 or more hours per week. Working at least 12 hours a day was associated with a 37 percent increased hazard rate; working at least 60 hours per week was associated with a 23 percent increased hazard rate.
  • The risk of injury was found to increase with the increasing length of the work schedule.
  • Multivariate analyses indicated that the increased risks are not merely the result of the demanding work schedules being concentrated in riskier occupations or industries.


Posted by Robert Shull



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill

Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl

Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act

For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"

Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers

Will New FDA Guidelines Really Reduce Conflicts of Interest?

Crane Rule Held Back by Bush Administration Ideology

Senate Passes Product Safety Bill

Archived Entries for Public Health

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004