The past few weeks have seen a flurry of stories about the ineffectiveness of government contractors government mismanagement. While I'd like to go into detail on each one (they are definitely worth a closer look), the stories are starting to pile up. Instead, a summary round-up of some of the contracting screw-ups that appeared so far in 2008.

** The Washington Times reported today that an investigation that lead to the conviction of a former GSA procurement official (Dessie Ruth Nelson) and two top executives at a private security company (Holiday International Security, Inc.) is being widened to include other "unrelated contractors" who may have bribed Nelson or other procurement officials. Nelson pleaded guilty in early January to accepting over $100,000 in bribes in exchange for steering contracts to the private security firm founded by Michael Holiday. Nelson received, among other things, a shopping bag filled with $35,000 in cash, an envelope containing $10,000, and a $7,000 Caribbean cruise.

** The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released a report on Jan. 11 that found a web site created for the Transportation Security Administration to address grievances from travelers incorrectly flagged by the government's no-fly list was poorly constructed and vulnerable to hackers. The report, covered in the Washington Post, Government Executive Magazine, and other tech blogs, concluded that cronyism and a lack of oversight exposed thousands of site visitors to identity theft. In this case, the contract was awarded without competition and the TSA official in charge of the contract was a former employee and good friend of the CEO of the contractor.

** Federal Times reports today that the top official at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is alleging that "poor contractor performance is delaying a new satellite that will monitor global environmental conditions." The contract in question was given to Raytheon (FedSpending Profile) and Northrop Grumman (FedSpending Profile), which have been slow to solve problems with a key instrument for the National Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS).

** Finally, the Washington Post also has an article today about a recent Government Accountability Office report that found a defense contractor hired to repair combat equipment "routinely failed to do the job right and then charged the government millions of dollars for the extra work," according to the WP. The contractor, ITT Industries (FedSpending Profile) apparently received $4.2 million for additional labor, according to the GAO report.

While we reported in December that Congressional Democrats had caved to President Bush's top-line appropriations number (while still attempting to fund their priorities), some things were certainly underfunded. Case in point is the Argonne National Laboratory in Darien, IL. Darien Suburban Life newspaper reports on the cutback:

Argonne Director Robert Rosner said in a memo to staff last week the cuts stem from unexpected reductions in Washington brought about by the Congressional budget appropriations bill passed in December.

Argonne's news followed the announcement of similar cuts at Batavia-based Fermilab, which learned in late December it will have to lay off as many as 200 employees due to cuts.

Director Rosner went on to say he thought the cutbacks would have a negative effect on morale at the lab, but that they would prevail. I'm not sure how they are going to do more scientific research with fewer people and resources, but perhaps Director Rosner has some tricks up his sleeve.

I suspect similar cutbacks will happen at other national labs around the country, slowing the pace of scientific discovery and development of new technologies. Remember that the U.S. government has developed numerous things through scientific and technological research that have been extremely valuable to our society. Space blankets, penicillin, the internet, and velco are only a few examples. It's too bad our elected officials can't prioritize funding for these important investment.

OMB Watch released a statement yesterday afternoon harshly criticizing the Democratically control Congress and the president for abandoning fiscal responsibility in the final hours of 2007 after they entire year was spent adhering to or attempting to adhere to righting our nation's fiscal course. From the statement:

Adding insult to a year of fiscal policy injuries, Congress has abandoned fiscal responsibility by waiving pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rules in order to pass a one-year patch to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) without offsets. This tax cut adds another $50 billion to an already expanding deficit next year, and will give fewer options for our children and grandchildren to seek solutions to the problems of tomorrow.

While I expect as much from President Bush, this is a huge disappointment from the new Democratic majority in Congress whose number one promise was to uphold pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rules. So much for promises:

This vote is particularly disappointing as Democrats have gone to great lengths this year to comply with PAYGO rules, particularly on spending. From student loan reforms to expansions of the State Children's Health Insurance Program and Food Stamps, Democrats have negotiated the turbulent fiscal waters of the federal budget responsibly, diligently, even courageously. That is why at this point, after all that work and sacrifice, the compromises and the concessions needed to construct balanced solutions to the AMT problem, it is unacceptable for them to abandon their stated principles of fiscal responsibility because they fear Americans will not accept paying up front for the services and benefits the country demands.

As the statement makes clear, there is plenty of blame to go around in Washington for this policy failure. What an awful way to end 2007.

The omnibus appropriations bill passed by the House last night contains 3,500 pages and over $516 billion in spending. Yet with all that space (and money), Congress could not find enough room for even their own priorities from earlier this year for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Specifics of the IRS's funding take from the omnibus show the House has included $2.15 billion for taxpayer services, down slightly from the $2.155 proposed earlier this year, $4.78 billion for enforcement (down from $4.93 billion) and $3.68 billion for operations (down from $3.77 billion). What's more, the House has backed away from a requirement for the IRS to develop a strategic plan to address the tax gap. The total IRS budget request ($10.89 billion) is $203 million below even President Bush's request!. What is going on here?

So, just to review, despite a year in which congressional hearings revealed that the IRS is underfunded, runs a dangerous and wasteful privatization program, and has no strategic plan for addressing the tax gap, Congress decided to give it less money, allow the privatization program to continue, and let the IRS off the hook for developing a strategic plan.

And I wonder why people don't believe in government...