|
|
Plugged In, Tuning Up (March 2001) LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Background
Individual legislators represent a citizen's main point of contact within the state legislature.
Each body as a whole, however, has an administrative structure that provides key operational
support, maintenance, and accountability within and across each chamber, to other branches
of government, and the public as well.
Items Examined
State legislative websites were evaluated in terms of whether links to the following items
were present: on the home page or major entry page
- Majority party leadership
- Minority party leadership
- Caucuses
- Clerk's Office
- Oversight body
- Legal, Ethics, or Legislative Affairs
- Library and legislative Research
- Special Bodies and Task Forces
Summary Findings by State
| State |
Majority |
Minority |
Caucus |
Clerk |
Oversight |
Legal Affairs |
Legislative Research |
Special Bodies |
| Alabama | Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Alaska | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Arizona | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
| Arkansas |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| California |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Colorado |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Connecticut |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Delaware |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Florida | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Georgia | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Hawaii | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Idaho | Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
| Illinois |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Indiana | No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Iowa | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Kansas | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Kentucky |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
| Louisiana |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Maine | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
| Maryland |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Massachusetts |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Michigan |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Minnesota |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Mississippi |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Missouri |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Montana | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Nebraska |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Nevada | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
| New Hampshire |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
| New Jersey |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
| New Mexico |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| New York (Senate) |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No | No |
| New York (Assembly) |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No | Yes |
| North Carolina |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
| North Dakota |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Ohio | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Oklahoma |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Oregon | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Pennsylvania |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Rhode Island |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| South Carolina |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
| South Dakota |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Tennessee |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
| Texas | No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
| Utah | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Vermont | No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
| Virginia |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
| Washington |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
| West Virginia |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
| Wisconsin |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
| Wyoming | Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
- 67% provide information on the state's legislative research body
- 51% of the websites provided links to majority leadership
- 45% provided links to minority leadership
- 31% provided contacts for legal, legislative affairs, or ethics matters
- 24% linked to the oversight body
- 18% linked to the office of the clerk
- 18% featured information on special bodies and task forces
- 16% featured information on caucuses
Considerations
There is a definite lack of online information regarding the administrative bodies within
state legislatures. None of the states, for example, provided access to all of the features outlined
above. Only twenty-six sites provided links to the majority party leadership, and three of those did
not provide visibility to the minority party leadership. Michigan, Tennessee, and Washington were
the only states, moreover, to provide access to the majority, minority, and caucus structures.
New Hampshire is the only state that provides links to the clerk, oversight body, and
legal/ethics/legislative affairs offices-- arguably the chief administrative structures of a state legislative body.
Recommendations
- Those entities that provide operational guidance and oversight also represent the
public's interest in the overall legislative process, especially when actors and their actions
run counter to that very process. To ensure and/or increase accountability, therefore, the
public should have information on and access to key leadership, oversight, and organizing
bodies within the legislature. This should include contact information, descriptions of
the responsibilities with which the entities are charged, and the authority under which they
exist and operate.
- Because a good amount of legislative business is also conducted within party
structures, and possibly through ideological lines or issue areas through caucuses, citizens need
to better understand the presence and functions of these bodies as well.
|